I didn't trust AI to write code unsupervised — so I built the supervisor. Every change an agent wants to make is checked against a spec you have read before it touches your business. Nothing ships that you didn't ask for.
For months, every build I ran went through a manual relay — the AI proposed, I checked by hand against what we'd agreed, then said yes or no. Nothing reached disk without that answer. Then I automated the reviewer.
Proof I can lead a real engineering team — devs, QA, a COO and investors stand behind it. I don't write its code. 7,000+ sales across the product line, a ~400-strong community.
Twelve products, one operator, one line. Every tool built with Claude Code under build-gate — spec frozen, every call checked, nothing session-wide. You pay the AI provider at their price. I take nothing on top.
The supervisor itself. Freezes the spec, checks every call, denies anything unsure. 512 tests green, guards mutation-tested.
45–80 minutes of images per article, down to about five. Built for myself first — then it escaped the lab.
Internal links placed for you, not by hand. Part of the seven-tool ai-era-seo-system, all BYOK.
JSON-LD @graph as a platform and WP plugin. Entity stacking that machines actually read.
Find → enrich → audit → qualify → draft into Gmail. Never sends. A human approves everything that leaves.
A father's problem, solved with software. Built after struggling to help my son prepare a parasha over WhatsApp.
The audit that caught an admin self-escalation before it shipped. One RLS gap, caught pre-production. Never reached users.
AI replies at roughly $0.01 — where competitors charge $0.50 and up. Because I never sit between you and the bill.
Three clicks on the task you dread every Monday. A verdict — automate it, gate it, kill it — same task in, same verdict out.
You pay provider rates on your own keys. I never sit between you and the bill.
Plain code does the heavy lifting — so it's cheap and it's the same every time.
What ran in March runs the same in September.
Nothing auto-posts, nothing auto-sends. Your name never leaves without a human approving it.
Single approvals only. No agent gets a blank cheque on your repo.
A check nobody has watched fail is only a hope. Yours gets broken before it protects anything.
If a task takes more than two steps and repeats — automate it or kill it. That's the question we answer on the call.
Paste a message you don't want to answer. Pick yes, no, stall or ask. It writes the reply — something you'd actually send, in ten seconds. Five spins free, no key needed. Built and shipped on the same line as everything above.
Think of one task. The one you do over and over — the one you dread on a Monday. Answer three questions. You get one of five verdicts: automate it, gate it, leave it manual, kill it, or bring it to the call. No form. No email. No pitch. The answer is a script, not a model: same task in, same verdict out, every time.
That is the verdict for the shape you described. The call is where we check it against the real workflow, with the numbers.
Book my call →No, and the check is the proof. Vibe coding means accepting whatever the AI produces because it looks right. Every change is reviewed against a plan we agreed, anything unclear is refused, and the review itself is tested.
On the tools, yes. On Chameleon Mode, no. Laziest Marketing is mine. Chameleon Mode has a dev team, QA, a COO and investors, and I'm the CEO.
Never. BYOK everywhere: you bring your own keys and pay provider rates directly. Network Nexa runs at roughly $0.01 per AI reply, where competitors charge $0.50 and up.
No. The posture is draft-only. cold-outreach-gmail drafts into Gmail and never sends. A human approves everything that leaves.
Nothing. Thirty minutes. You bring the workflow that repeats every week. We decide whether to automate it or kill it, and you keep that answer either way.
A Workflow Audit, then one of two paths. We go through your workflows and you get a Loom walkthrough plus a written document with an automate-or-kill verdict on each. Then either I build it and manage it on a monthly retainer, or your team executes the plan under a build-gate licence. Everything is priced on the call.
An agency builds from scratch with whoever is free. I run one line that has already shipped twelve times. Same spec format, same gate, same tests, and the person who built the line runs it on your work.
Anyone who wants an agent running unsupervised, or a build without a spec they've read. We'd disagree inside ten minutes and I'd rather you keep the half hour.
If you'd rather watch for a while before you talk, this is the low-commitment way in. Around 1,300 subscribers already read it.
The workflow that repeats every week gets automated or killed. If the answer is "kill it", you leave with that — and it has cost you the half hour.
Book the call — 30 min →